Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office, 31 P.3d 845.

26 citing documents.

KAUFMAN v. GUEVARA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
KAUFMAN v. GUEVARA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Att’y’s Off., ¶ 7 (App. 2001) (“‘An automobile is, potentially, a dangerous instrumentality, as the appalling number of fatalities brought about every day by its operation bear distressing witness.’” (quoting Dist.
Spence v. Bacal 413 P.3d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Spence v. Bacal 413 P.3d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Attorney's Office , , ¶ 2, , 846 (App. 2001).
State of Arizona v. Bhajanpal Chopra 387 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Bhajanpal Chopra 387 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Attorney’s Office, P.3d 845 (App. 2001) (hearing as 3 STATE v. CHOPRA Opinion of the Court civil appeal superior court’s grant of relief on special action petition concerning right to jury trial for defendant charged with misdemeanor reckless d
Peter J. Kaniowsky v. the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court The Hon. Maria L. Felix 371 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Peter J. Kaniowsky v. the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court The Hon. Maria L. Felix 371 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State v. Le Noble 164 P.3d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Le Noble 164 P.3d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
¶ 3 , (citing *182 Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, ¶ 2 , ).
Crowell v. Jejna 161 P.3d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Crowell v. Jejna 161 P.3d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
at 420, ¶ 12, 104 P.3d at 151 (alterations in original) (discussing Urs, ¶ 10 , ).
Fushek v. State 159 P.3d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Fushek v. State 159 P.3d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, ¶ 2
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney’s Office
Abuhl v. Howell 135 P.3d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Abuhl v. Howell 135 P.3d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, ¶ 2
Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
See Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, , 72 ¶ 2
Derendal v. Griffith 104 P.3d 147 Ariz. 2005
Derendal v. Griffith 104 P.3d 147 Ariz. 2005
¶ 8, (quotations omitted).
David G. v. Pollard Ex Rel. County of Pima 86 P.3d 364 Ariz. 2004
David G. v. Pollard Ex Rel. County of Pima 86 P.3d 364 Ariz. 2004
See Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, ¶ 2, (holding that reckless driving is a jury-eligible offense under Article 2, Sections 23 and 24, of the Arizona Constitution).
Derendal v. Griffith 83 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Derendal v. Griffith 83 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney’s *53 Office, ¶ 2