Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Zimmerman v. Shakman, 62 P.3d 976.
- Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Schwab v. Ames Const. 83 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
Schwab v. Ames Const.
83 P.3d 56
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(citing Chanay, 115 Ariz. at 38 , 563 P.2d at 293 ); ¶ 21 , (stating that Rule 7.1(b) "is not mandatory, and the failure to respond does not in and of itself authorize a judgment against the nonmoving party if the motion fails to demonstrate the movant's entitlement to the requested relief").