Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Schwab v. Ames Const., 83 P.3d 56.

58 citing documents.

Backus v. State 204 P.3d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Malad, Inc. v. Miller 199 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
60, ¶ 17, , 60 (App. 2004).
Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Ass'n v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc. 189 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
v. Reeves, , , 60, ¶ 17, , 60 (App. 2004).
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
We review a superior court's "grant of summary judgment on the basis of the record made in [that] court, but we determine de novo whether the entry of [summary] judgment was proper.” ¶ 17
Burkhamer v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
th a timely filed or premature notice of appeal that is allegedly deficient or defective, in which case, “fairness demands that ‘no mere technical error should prevent the appellate court from reaching the merits of the appeal.’” (absent prejudice to appellee, “technical defects or omissions in a notice of appeal are usually not jurisdictional”); McKillip v. Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc., -63, 945 14 palatable or even preferable, this court is bound b
Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc. 146 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Hamblin v. State 143 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
60, ¶ 17, , 60 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).
Jennifer G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 123 P.3d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005