Cited by

–56, ¶¶ 17–18 (App. 2004) (“Although the trial court’s signed minute entry does not specifically detail [Father]’s financial situation, the 6 MURPHY v. RODRIGUEZ Decision of the Court foregoing evidence is presumed to have be

¶ 27 (App. 2004) (we will not disturb an evidentiary ruling “absent both a clear abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice.”).

–56 ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (noting that appellate court presumed trial court had considered relevant factors, even though it did not “specifically detail” them in its ruling).

3 MANN v. HESTER Decision of the Court Husband points to nothing in the record to show that the court did not consider the Social Security payments when determining Wife's ability to pay spousal maintenance.2 ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (as amended) (noting "evidence is presumed to have been fully considered by the court prior to issuing its decision").

Because of the family court’s substantial discretion in setting spousal maintenance, Rainwater, 177 Ariz. at 502, we presume that the family court fully considered the evidence in the record in issuing the decree, even if the decree does not detail the relevant evidence considered, ¶ 18 (App. 2004).

Prejudice must appear affirmatively from the record.”); ¶ 28 (App. 2004) (“[T]he erroneous admission of evidence that is substantially cumulative may constitute harmless error.”).

-56, ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2004).

“[W]e will not alter the superior court’s community property distribution absent an abuse of that court’s broad discretion to apportion the community property.” Saba v. Khoury, ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶ 5, ¶ 23 (App. 2004) (“An abuse of discretion exists when the trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.”); ¶ 5 (1999) (citation omitted) (“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the tri

–56 ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (appellate courts presume the superior court fully considered evidence admitted at trial).

We review a court’s order granting or denying post-decree relief for an abuse of discretion, which occurs if the court commits an error of law in exercising its discretion, ¶ 23 (App. 2004).

¶19 Although trial judges are presumed to know and correctly apply the law, ¶ 32 (App. 2004), the parties’ reiterations of the incorrect burden and the juvenile court’s failure to express the correct burden at trial or in its initial order make it impossible to conclude the result of the guardianship proceeding complied with the law.

Law P. 86 (“At every stage of the proceeding, the court must disregard all errors and defects that do not affect any party’s substantial rights.”); ¶ 27 (App. 2004) (“[W]e will not disturb the trial court’s admission of the document absent both a clear abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice.”).

§ 25-403.03(C) (listing relevant factors the court must consider to determine if an act of domestic violence has occurred); - 56, ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (stating this Court assumes the family court fully considered all admitted evidence).

But we assume that the court considered all admissible evidence, –56, ¶ 18 (App. 2004),there is no requirement that the court identify and consider every factor, and the forum non conveniens standard is flexible, with each case turning on its own unique facts, Piper Aircraft, 454 U.S. at 249–50.

“An abuse of discretion exists when the trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 23 (App. 2004).

¶ 24 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).

¶6 “Although we presume that the trial court knows the law and applies the correct standard, that presumption may be rebutted by the record.” ¶ 18 (App. 2009) ( ¶ 32 (App. 2004); ).

-56, ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (trial court presumed to have considered all the evidence).

“An abuse of discretion may occur when a trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 2005) ( ¶ 23 (App. 2004)).

¶ 24 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).

-56, ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (“[T]he foregoing evidence is presumed to have been fully considered by the court prior to issuing its decision.” (citing Able Distrib.