Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler, 118 P.3d 621.

189 citing documents.

Foor v. Hon. smith/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Foor v. Hon. smith/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
McCammon v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The trial court abuses its discretion if the record lacks competent evidence to support its decision, ¶ 5, or the court makes “an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2
ades/kaflik v. Freiwald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
ades/kaflik v. Freiwald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005) (in the absence of a transcript, the appellate court will presume the record supports the trial court’s rulings); ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (appellant’s brief must contain citations to portions of the record relied upon in its brief).
Lynch v. Brakebill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lynch v. Brakebill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The trial court abuses its discretion if the record lacks competent evidence to support its decision, ¶ 5, or the court made “an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
A court abuses its discretion if the record lacks competent evidence to support the superior court’s decision, ¶ 5, or the court made “an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2
Manola v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Manola v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
A court abuses its discretion if the record lacks competent evidence supporting the trial court's decision, ¶ 5, or the court made “an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2
Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In Re the Marriage of Thorn 330 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
In Re the Marriage of Thorn 330 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(division of marital property reviewed in light most favorable to upholding family court’s ruling, which is not disturbed absent abuse of discretion).
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n.1, n.1 (App. 2005) (citing Baker v. Baker, 183 Ariz. at 73, 900 P.2d at 767).
Davies v. Davies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Davies v. Davies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n. 1, ¶ 8, n. 1 (App. 2005).
Rewers v. Pope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rewers v. Pope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 8 n.1, n.1 (App. 2005).
State of Arizona v. Alyssa Marie Burr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Alyssa Marie Burr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
n.1, n.1 (App. 2005) (in absence of transcript, reviewing court must presume it supports ruling court’s decision); -21, -79 (App. 1986) (same).
In Re the ESTATE OF FRANCES B. LEWIS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In Re the ESTATE OF FRANCES B. LEWIS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
(court abuses 18 discretion by committing error of law in process of exercising discretion); Birds Int’l Corp., 135 Ariz. at 546-47, 662 P.2d at 1053-54 (hearing required, in part, to allow court “to determine most appropriate sanctio
Blair v. Burgener 245 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Blair v. Burgener 245 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
n. 1 , , 623 n. 1 (App.2005); Chavarria v. State Farm Mut.
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Generally, in the absence of transcripts, we presume they support the trial court’s factual findings and rulings, n. 1 , , 623 n. 1 (App.2005).
Marriage of Barnett v. Jedynak 200 P.3d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Marriage of Barnett v. Jedynak 200 P.3d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re the Marriage of Williams 200 P.3d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In Re the Marriage of Williams 200 P.3d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
(abuse of discretion may oc *550 cur when court commits error of law in process of exercising discretion).
Marriage of Bell-Kilbourn v. Bell-Kilbourn 169 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Bell-Kilbourn v. Bell-Kilbourn 169 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Boncoskey v. Boncoskey 167 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Boncoskey v. Boncoskey 167 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
But the court may abuse its discretion if it “commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2
Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers 166 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers 166 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
407(a) (1998) (federal law prohibits the transfer or assignment of rights to Social Security benefits); , *378 108, ¶ 10, (citations omitted) (state law prohibits the division of Social Security as community property); ¶ 5 , (citation omitted).