Cited by

Because Kurtz did not provide a transcript of the proceedings, we “presume the record supports the trial court’s rulings.” ¶ 8 n.1 (App. 2005) (); see also ARCAP 11(b)-(c) (stating the appellant is responsible for ensuring “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal”).

“An abuse of discretion may occur when a trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 2005) ( ¶ 23 (App. 2004)).

§ 25-403, -22, ¶ 12 (App. 2003) (holding court abused its discretion by modifying custody without making findings on the record); 2) lacks competent evidence supporting its decision, ¶ 5 (1999); or 3) “commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion,” ¶ 2 (App. 2005).

The day before trial, Mother filed a separate pretrial statement that was 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” ¶ 1 n.1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

§ 25-403.03.2 The court ordered both parties to undergo weekly random alcohol testing, appointed a best-interests 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” ¶ 1 n.1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

3(c) ; Kohler v. Kohler , , ¶ 2, (abuse of discretion includes an error of law).

ANDERSON, et al. Decision of the Court discretion occurs if the superior court commits an error of law while exercising its discretion, ¶ 2 (App. 2005), and a summary denial of a motion to intervene is an abuse of discretion, ¶ 22 (App. 1998).

Id.; n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005).

In calculating these sums, the court included Husband’s earnings as a part-time adjunct professor at Maricopa Community Colleges (MCC) in addition to his regular, full-time earnings 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

Because Husband did not provide the transcript of the evidentiary hearing, we presume the record supports the family court’s ruling.4 n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005).

Phillips did not provide any 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

Kohler v. Kohler , , 107, ¶ 2, , 622 (App. 2005).

n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

“An abuse of discretion may occur when a trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 2005).

n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

¶ 14, 118 P.3d at 624 (applying Kelly analysis).