Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler, 118 P.3d 621.

189 citing documents.

Fiori v. Lanini-Fiori Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 25-403.03.2 The court ordered both parties to undergo weekly random alcohol testing, appointed a best-interests 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” ¶ 1 n.1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).
Johnson v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johnson v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Starr Pass Resort Devs., LLC v. Harrington 431 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Starr Pass Resort Devs., LLC v. Harrington 431 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
3(c) ; Kohler v. Kohler , , ¶ 2, (abuse of discretion includes an error of law).
Jones v. Hon Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jones v. Hon Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
ANDERSON, et al. Decision of the Court discretion occurs if the superior court commits an error of law while exercising its discretion, ¶ 2 (App. 2005), and a summary denial of a motion to intervene is an abuse of discretion, ¶ 22 (App. 1998).
State v. Miller 429 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Miller 429 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Id.; n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005).
Smith v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Smith v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In calculating these sums, the court included Husband’s earnings as a part-time adjunct professor at Maricopa Community Colleges (MCC) in addition to his regular, full-time earnings 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).
Riley v. Riley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Riley v. Riley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Because Husband did not provide the transcript of the evidentiary hearing, we presume the record supports the family court’s ruling.4 n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005).
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Phillips did not provide any 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jimenez v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jimenez v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Birnstihl v. Birnstihl 416 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Birnstihl v. Birnstihl 416 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kohler v. Kohler , , 107, ¶ 2, , 622 (App. 2005).
Navarro v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Navarro v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).
Evers v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Evers v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).
Sherman v. Sherman 384 P.3d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sherman v. Sherman 384 P.3d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“An abuse of discretion may occur when a trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 2005).
Calcagno v. Ainbinder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Calcagno v. Ainbinder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.1, ¶ 1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).
Carranza v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Carranza v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 14, 118 P.3d at 624 (applying Kelly analysis).
Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In the absence of a transcript, we “presume that the record supports the trial court’s rulings.” n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005) (citing Baker, 183 Ariz. at 73).
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 2 (App. 2005) ( ¶ 23 (App. 2004)).
Flynn v. Rodrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Flynn v. Rodrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.” (internal citations omitted); see also ARCAP 11(b); n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005); ¶ 11 (App. 1998).
Backus v. Ellison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Backus v. Ellison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.1 ¶ 8, n.1 (App. 2005).
Jessica E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jessica E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
McCammon v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015