Cited by

¶ 2 (App. 2005) (citation omitted) (an abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits an error of law).

¶ 2 (App. 2005); ¶ 9 (App. 2016); ¶ 18 (App. 2011) (“The presence of contrary facts does not render a trial court’s factual determinations clearly erroneous.”).

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 2 (App. 2005).

¶ 8 n.1 (App. 2005); (“We may only consider the matters in the record before us.”).

Kelly, 198 Ariz. at 308, ¶ 5; ¶ 10 (App. 2005).

had stated he planned to live in Flagstaff for a “‘couple months,’ he continue[d] to live in Flagstaff at the time of the [evidentiary] hearing and ha[d] now been living there for the past six months.” 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s ruling.” ¶ 1 n.1 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

“An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits an error of law that underlies its exercise of discretion.” ¶ 8 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2005)).

The superior court abuses its discretion when it “commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 2005).