Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Charles I. Friedman, P.C. v. Microsoft Corp., 141 P.3d 824.

87 citing documents.

CHOPKO v. FIDELITY NATIONAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
CHOPKO v. FIDELITY NATIONAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Iqtunheimr v. Val Vista Lakes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Iqtunheimr v. Val Vista Lakes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (citation modified).
In Re the Marriage of Wichansky Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
In Re the Marriage of Wichansky Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006)).
Harvey v. Borbon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Harvey v. Borbon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (internal quotation and citation omitted).
Prakelt v. Reform Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Prakelt v. Reform Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (reviewing an attorneys’ fee award for an abuse of discretion).
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (noting that when no evidence in the record supports the superior court’s conclusion, such deficiency constitutes abuse 6 BUDZISZEWSKI v. BUDZISZEWSKI/CAMPBELL Decision of the Court of discretion).
Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006); 583, ¶¶ 7, 26 (App. 2000).
Duffy v. Pearson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Duffy v. Pearson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (a superior court does not abuse its discretion unless no evidence supports the court’s conclusion or the reasons the court provides are “clearly untenable, legally incorrect, or amount to a denial of justice.”) (citation omitted).
Rector v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Silverdove v. Greenbank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Rector v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Silverdove v. Greenbank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
Goodard v. Goodard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Goodard v. Goodard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
In Re $200.00 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re $200.00 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006)
Bmo Harris v. Galusha Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bmo Harris v. Galusha Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Ohmstedt v. Ohmstedt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ohmstedt v. Ohmstedt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) ( n.18 (1983).
Lattimer v. Brisbon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lattimer v. Brisbon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Smith-Harris v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Smith-Harris v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Thieme v. Szewczyk Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Thieme v. Szewczyk Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Microsoft Corp., THIEME, et al. v. SZEWCZYK, et al. Decision of the Court 350, ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Bell & 63rd v. Auto-Owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Bell & 63rd v. Auto-Owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (“To find an abuse of discretion, there must either be no evidence to support the superior court’s conclusion or the reasons given by the court must be clearly untenable, legally incorrect, or amount to a denial of justice.”).
Preciado v. Young America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Preciado v. Young America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Microsoft Corp., n.2, ¶ 1, n.2 (App. 2006) (stating that “[a] lodestar figure is ‘the product of reasonable hours times a reasonable rate.’”) (citation omitted).
First Financial v. Claassen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
First Financial v. Claassen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (citations and quotations omitted).
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Pacific Financial Ass'n 388 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Pacific Financial Ass'n 388 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006) (citation omitted).