Cited by

¶ 14 (App. 2006) (a general verdict reflects the jury’s conclusion that all crucial elements have been proven in favor of the successful party).

¶ 7 (App. 2006) (citation omitted).

“To be admissible, a photograph must be a reasonably faithful representation of the object depicted.” ¶ 8 (App. 2006).

We review the court’s evidentiary decision for an abuse of discretion and will not disturb the decision if “supported by any reasonable evidence.” ¶ 7 (App. 2006) (citation omitted).

LLC, (“[I]t is not necessary that an expert witness be a medical doctor in order to offer testimony regarding the causation of physical injuries so long as .

¶ 26 n.5 (App. 2006) (noting failure to develop an argument in opening brief will result in waiver).

–59, ¶¶ 9–10 (App. 2008); ¶ 8 (App. 2006).

¶ 13 (App. 2006); ¶¶ 91-92 (2013) (verdict forms may remedy an alleged deficiency in jury instructions).

–65, ¶¶ 26–29 (App. 2006).

of evidence unless [the court] finds a clear abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice.'" ( ¶ 7 (App. 2006))); ¶ 7 (App. 2017) ("We will affirm the court's disposition if it is correct for any reason.").

State v. Haight-Gyuro , , ¶ 7, (quoting Lohmeier v. Hammer , , ¶ 8, ).

¶ 20 (App. 2006) (concluding the trial court did not err in refusing to use the fees charged by an opposing expert witness as a 3 The Rule has since been amended to require that fee applications be “supported by affidavit” and comply with Rule 7.1.

¶16 The superior court has broad discretion in admitting expert testimony, ¶ 25 (App. 2006), and we will not disturb its decision to allow expert testimony absent an abuse of discretion, ¶ 65 (2014).

“Failure to give a requested verdict form is not reversible error unless the omission was prejudicial to the moving party.” -62, ¶ 13 (App. 2006) ().

This court reviews the superior court’s rulings for an abuse of discretion and will affirm “absent a clear abuse or legal error and resulting prejudice.” ¶ 6 (App. 2006).