Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Grynberg v. Shaffer, 165 P.3d 234.

24 citing documents.

  • Ulrich v. Courteau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Barnes v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    –250, ¶¶ 9–15 (1999) (explaining that a judgment “exists as an independent resolution by the court of the issues before it and rightfully is regarded in that context and not according to the negotiated intent of the parties”); ¶ 6 (App. 2007) (“[A] foreign judgment properly filed with the superior court of Arizona will be treated in the same manner as a domestic judgment.”).
  • Lenk v. Monolithic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Lenk v. Monolithic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Costaras v. Costaras 546 P.3d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Costaras v. Costaras 546 P.3d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    at ¶ 9 (internal quotation omitted); see also U.S. Const. art. 4, § 1; ¶ 6 (App. 2007) (“[A] foreign judgment properly filed with the superior court of Arizona [under the UEFJA] will be treated in the same manner as a domestic judgment.”) (citing A.R.S.
  • Nextgear v. Owens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Nextgear v. Owens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Cocchia v. Testa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Cocchia v. Testa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    5 COCCHIA v. TESTA, et al. Decision of the Court ¶18 “Because the judgment of a sister state must be final before full faith and credit attaches, [this court looks to Connecticut] law to determine when the judgment in this case became final.” ¶ 8 (App. 2007).
  • McDaniel v. Banes 471 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • McDaniel v. Banes 471 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Monroe v. Az Acreage 443 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Monroe v. Az Acreage 443 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Strobel v. Rosier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Strobel v. Rosier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Bmo Harris v. Tohatan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Bmo Harris v. Tohatan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Kelleher v. Storey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Kelleher v. Storey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Ramirez v. Barnet 384 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Ramirez v. Barnet 384 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶ 5, (reviewing issue of full faith and credit de novo) (citations omitted); see also J.D.S.
  • Honeywell v. Kilgore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Followed Honeywell v. Kilgore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015