Cited by

v. VandenBerg, ¶ 22 (App. 2023) (denying petitioners’ request for award of attorney fees without prejudice and authorizing the superior court to award “fees incurred in this special action” after resolving pending motion “on the merits”); Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007) (denying appellant’s request for award of attorney fees on appeal, “deferring this request to the trial court’s discretion pending resolution of the matter on the merits”).

See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, – 02, ¶¶ 24–27 (App. 2007) (adopting the Restatement’s approach that HOAs have a duty to “act reasonably in the exercise of its discretionary powers including [] enforcement” (quoting Restatement (Third) of Property: Servitudes § 6.13(1)(c)) (emphasis added)).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).

See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

KEMP/AMERICAN Opinion of the Court See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).

See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007) (deferring party’s request for attorneys’ fees on appeal “to the trial court’s discretion pending resolution of the matter on the merits”).

“We view the facts and any inferences drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

“We view the facts and any inferences drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, “view[ing] the facts and any inferences drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

¶ 6 (App. 2016); ¶ 15 (App. 2007).