Cited by

“An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no evidence to support a holding or the court commits an error of law when reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 45 (App. 2009) (citations omitted); see also Grant v. Ariz. Pub.

“An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no evidence to support a holding or the court commits an error of law when reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 45

The notion that such arguments can never be waived applies “only when the appellant timely appeals from the underlying appealable order or judgment, but has failed to raise [the argument] below.” , 264 n. 13, ¶ 38, , 1248 n. 13 (App.2009) (citing Health for Life Brands, ¶ 12 , and Butler Prods.

Stated differently, “‘[a] party who accepts an award or legal advantage under an order, judgment or decree’” gives up the right “‘to any [appellate] review of the adjudication as may again put in issue his right to the benefit which he has accepted.’” ¶ 42, ( Nathan later sold substantially all of the assets of the Companies to a third party.

DISCUSSION ¶10 “Dismissal of a forfeiture claim for failure to comply with procedural requirements is reviewed for abuse of discretion.” United States v. $11,500.00 in U.S. Currency, 710 F.3d 1006, 1011 (9th Cir. 2013); ¶ 45, (“A court’s decision to strike pleadings is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”).

-70, ¶ 57, -54 (App. 2009).

(intervenor must have interest such that judgment would have direct legal effect upon rights).

-70, ¶ 57 , -54 (App. 2009).