Cited by

-70 ¶ 57 (App. 2009) (citing cases).

§ 8-844(C)(1) (directing the court to make required findings when adjudicating a child dependent); ¶ 38 n.13 (App. 2009) (“Generally, subject matter jurisdiction of the superior court cannot be 5 IN RE DEPENDENCY AS TO L.P.

¶14 “Generally, a party must file a notice of appeal within thirty days of the entry of an appealable order pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure (“ARCAP”) 9.” ¶ 39 (App. 2009).

n.13 (App. 2009) (“Generally, subject matter jurisdiction of the superior court cannot be waived.”).

¶10 We have an independent obligation to examine our jurisdiction over an appeal, ¶ 5 (App. 2021), and lack jurisdiction over an untimely appeal, ¶ 39 (App. 2009).

-74 ¶¶ 72-76 (App. 2009).

¶ 36 n.12 (App. 2009) ("[A]ppeal from the final judgment would include appeals from otherwise non-appealable interlocutory orders.").

¶ 45 (App. 2009); Birth Hope Adoption Agency

–75, ¶¶ 76, 78 (App. 2009); –81 (App. 1987).

¶ 39 (App. 2009) (failure to timely appeal interlocutory order appointing a receiver precludes later challenge on direct appeal).

“An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no evidence to support a holding or the court commits an error of law when reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 45 (App. 2009).

A reviewing court does not “substitute [its] discretion for that of the trial court,” Marquez, 231 Ariz. at 441 ¶ 14, and the evidence is considered “in the light most favorable to upholding the superior court’s ruling,” ¶ 45 (App. 2009).

¶ 45 (App. 2009); ¶ 17 (App. 2004) (noting that rulings under Rule 7.1 are reviewed for an abuse of discretion).

“An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no evidence to support a holding or the court commits an error of law when reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 45 (App. 2009); see also Grant v. Ariz. Pub.

See Dowling v. Stapley , , 264, ¶ 39, , 1248 (App. 2009).

“An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no evidence to support a holding or the court commits an error of law when reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 45 (App. 2009); see also Grant v. Ariz. Pub.

“An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no evidence to support a holding or the court commits an error of law when reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 45, see also Grant v. Ariz. Pub.