Cited by

¶ 62 (App. 2009).2 Because Valencia has not demonstrated genuine issues of material fact exist, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment rulings.

actually influenced the verdict.’” ¶ 51 (App. 2009) (quoting Anderson Aviation Sales Co., ).

P.3d 1272 (App. 2009) (noting that a failure to raise an issue and provide citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record can constitute abandonment and waiver of claim).

Ontiveros, 136 Ariz. at 505, 667 P.2d at 205 (cause-in-fact); -99, ¶ 23, -82 (App. 2009) (proximate cause).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (requiring brief of appellant contain “citations of legal authorities” in support of each issue presented for review); ¶ 62, (deeming waived issue not supported by authority in opening brief).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (stating that failure to provide citations to authorities can constitute abandonment and waiver of the claim).

¶ 62, (stating that failure to present arguments in the opening briefs “can constitute abandonment and waiver”).

See ARCAP 13(a)(6) (requiring argument in appellate brief contain “citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied upon”); ¶ 62, (deeming waived an issue unsupported by legal authority).

vacating, modifying or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice.”); ARCAP 13(a)(6) (requiring argument in appellate brief contain “citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied upon”); ¶ 62, (deeming waived an issue unsupported by legal authority).

¶ 62, (holding the failure to comply with ARCAP Rule 13 can constitute waiver of that claim).

¶ 62, (citation omitted).

¶¶ 28-29, (holding jury did not err in finding physician’s misdiagnosis was partially the proximate cause of decedent’s fatal overdose of pain medication used to treat the overlooked condition); -81, ¶¶ 24-26, -61 (App. 2004) (d

Co., SANDRETTO v. PAYSON HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC. Opinion of the Court 1287 (App. 2009) (trial court in “best position” to determine whether misconduct materially affected rights of other party).

App. P. 13(a)(6) (opening brief “shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”); (failure to comply with Rule 13(a)(6) waives argument).

P. 13(a)(6); ¶ 62, (noting that the failure to cite to authority, statutes and parts of the record relied upon may constitute abandonment and waiver of a claim).

Revised Arizona Jury Instructions (Civil) Preliminary 7; ER.

-04, ¶ 54 , -88 (App.2009) ("Courts give counsel 1 "wide latitude” in closing arguments to "comment on the evidence and argue all reasonable inferences” from it.’ ” (citations omitted)); accord United States v. Parker, 549 F.2d 1217, 1222 (9th Cir.1977) (holding that because counsel did not "mis

App. P. 13(a)(6); ¶¶ 61-62

See, ¶ 11 , Patterson v. Thunder Pass, Inc., ¶¶ 9-10

“The existence of a duty is a question of law that we review de novo.” Diaz v. Phoenix Lubrication Serv., Inc., ¶ 12 , ( ¶ 11 , ).

The discovery rule tolls limitations "until the plaintiff possesses a minimum knowledge sufficient to recognize that a `wrong occurred and caused injury.'" ¶ 57 , ( ¶ 22 , ).

¶ 62 , see A Tumbling-T Ranches, 222 Ariz. at 529, ¶34 , 217 P.3d at 1234 (it is not the responsibility of this court to search the record for authorities that support parties' arguments).