Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Ritchie v. Krasner, 211 P.3d 1272.
-
SHUMATE v. DAVIS/BROADBENT
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 8 (App. 2022) (arguments “not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority” are waived on appeal) (citation omitted); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to comply with ARCAP 13 “can constitute abandonment and waiver” of claims).
- Stromberg v. Heirigs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to H.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to H.K.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
ARCAP 13(a)(7); ¶ 3 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO H.K.
- Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Tanner v. Clymer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Tanner v. Clymer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”).
- Anderson v. Winston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Anderson v. Winston
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (claims waived when appellant fails to support argument with citations to the record).
- Lucky Horse v. Yarbrough Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Lucky Horse v. Yarbrough
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to present and address arguments, supported by authority can constitute abandonment and waiver of the claim).
- Goetzinger-Amendt v. Goetzinger-Poe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Goetzinger-Amendt v. Goetzinger-Poe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Scott v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Scott v. Scott
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 8 (App. 2022); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Jones v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Jones v. Cohen
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 62 (App. 2009) (citing Schabel v. Deer Valley Unified Sch.
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Ij and Aj Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Ij and Aj
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Ct. 607(b) (applying ARCAP 13 to juvenile appeals); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (noting 3 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO I.J.
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Jane Doe I; Jane Doe II; And John Doe v. Lenzner Medical Services Llc... ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Jane Doe I; Jane Doe II; And John Doe v. Lenzner Medical Services Llc... ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Farnsworth v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Farnsworth v. Moore
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–65, ¶ 6 (2013) (stating that arguments are waived if not properly developed); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).
- Jane Doe I & II; And John Doe... v. Shaunice Warr 566 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Jane Doe I & II; And John Doe... v. Shaunice Warr 566 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Gurashi v. intermountain/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Gurashi v. intermountain/zurich
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
3 GURASHI v. INTERMOUNTAIN/ZURICH Decision of the Court ¶13 “Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.” ¶ 62 (App. 2009).
- Harianto v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Harianto v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Brown v. Olde Fashioned Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Pittman v. Gcu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Brown v. Olde Fashioned
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Under the “discovery rule,” however, a limitations statute “does not begin to run until the plaintiff possesses a minimum knowledge sufficient to recognize that a wrong occurred and caused injury.” ¶ 57 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).
-
Pittman v. Gcu
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 62 (App. 2009) (noting that a failure to comply with ARCAP 13(a)(7) “can constitute abandonment and waiver of the party’s claims”).
- Eli v. Procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Eli v. Procaccianti
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 62 (App. 2009) (explaining that failure to present and address arguments supported by authority can constitute abandonment and waiver of the claim).
- Jimenez v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Jimenez v. Dominguez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See ARCAP 13(a)(7) (requiring references to the record and citations supporting legal authority in Appellant’s opening brief); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (holding that failure to comply with ARCAP 13(a)(7) resulted in waiver of an argument).
- Finchem v. Fontes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Finchem v. Fontes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-
State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald
548 P.3d 1110
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
(providing that failure to develop argument and support it with authority can constitute abandonment and waiver).
- Krivulka v. Lerner/krivulka Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Krivulka v. Lerner/krivulka Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Wedel v. Olympian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Wedel v. Olympian
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 56 (App. 2009) (affirmative defense of statute of limitations is waived unless raised).