Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gaveck v. Arizona State Board of Podiatry Examiners, 215 P.3d 1114.

67 citing documents.

SIMMS v. ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION Ariz. 2026
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009); see Webster v. State Bd.
Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009); ¶ 13 (2017).
Flores v. La Paz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Flores v. La Paz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
Warner v. Driggs-Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Warner v. Driggs-Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 14 (App. 2009).
Dow v. Az Nsac Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dow v. Az Nsac Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 12 (App. 2009).
University Medical v. Health Choice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
University Medical v. Health Choice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 12 (App. 2009).
Phillip B. v. adcs/faust Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Phillip B. v. adcs/faust Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶¶ 11-12 (App. 2009).
Batty v. Az Medical Brd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Batty v. Az Medical Brd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 12 (App. 2009).2 A. Sexual Intent/Motivation ¶12 Dr. Batty argues § 32-1401(27)(aa)(ii) must be read to require that a physician act with “sexual intent” before the Board can impose discipline for engaging in conduct of a sexual nature.
Mills v. Abotr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Mills v. Abotr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (“Without clearly articulated standards as a backdrop against which the court can review discipline, the judicial function is reduced to serving as a rubber-stamp for the Board’s action.” (citation omitted)).
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 12 (App. 2009), and “independently examine[s] the record to determine whether the evidence supports the judgment,” 2Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes and rules cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated.
Johnson v. Ahccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Johnson v. Ahccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009); see also A.R.S.
JH2K I LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 438 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
JH2K I LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 438 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Podiatry Exam'rs , , 436 ¶¶ 11-12
Ruben v. Amb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 12 (App. 2009) (stating the Court of Appeals “engage[s] in the same process as the superior court when we review its ruling affirming an administrative decision”).
Ruben v. Amb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
McSo v. McLeo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
McSo v. McLeo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶¶ 11- 12 (App. 2009); Shorey v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, ¶ 11 (App. 2015) (citations omitted).
Paloma v. Srvwua Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Paloma v. Srvwua Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
of Podiatry Exam'rs, ¶¶ 11-12 (App. 2009) (noting the appeals court applies the same standard of review as the superior court when reviewing an appeal from an administrative decision).
Cleckner v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Cleckner v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶¶ 11–12 (App. 2009); see A.R.S.
Abc v. Flood Control Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Abc v. Flood Control Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
Thomas horne/kathleen Winn v. Sheila Polk 394 P.3d 651 Ariz. 2017
Thomas horne/kathleen Winn v. Sheila Polk 394 P.3d 651 Ariz. 2017
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11
Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 14 (App. 2009).
Wassef v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners ex rel. Hugunin 393 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wassef v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners ex rel. Hugunin 393 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 14 , (citation omitted).
Shudak v. Azcc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shudak v. Azcc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
of Podiatry Examiners, ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
Robison v. Az Brd Dental Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Robison v. Az Brd Dental Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
of Podiatry Exam’rs, ¶ 11
Jhass Group L.L.C. v. Arizona Department of Financial Institutions 360 P.3d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015