Cited by

Co., -80, ¶¶ 60-62 (App. 2010) (Where the relevant version of Rule 54(g)(2) provided that a motion for attorney’s fees “shall be filed within 20 days from the clerk’s mailing of a decision on the merits of the cause, unless extended by the trial court,” the court could extend the deadline absent prejudice.).

Co., ¶ 41 (App. 2010) (“When interpreting an insurance contract, we have a duty to ‘harmonize all parts of the contract .

¶37 “[T]he parol evidence rule bars admission of extrinsic evidence” to interpret a written contract if such evidence “varies or contradicts the terms of [the] written contract.” ¶ 52 (App. 2010).

Co., ¶ 56 (App. 2010) (“[A] cardinal rule of contract interpretation that we do not construe one term of a contract to essentially render meaningless another term.”).

Co., ¶ 48 (App. 2010) (“It is the duty of the court to adopt a construction of a contract which will harmonize all of its parts, and apparently conflicting parts must be reconciled, if possible, by any reasonable interpretation.” (quoting U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Constr.

Co., -80, ¶ 61 (App. 2010) (interpreting Rule 54(g)(2)); Nat’l Broker Assocs., Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc., ¶ 38 (App. 2005) (concluding the court had discretion to consider an untimely attorneys’ fee application).

Co., ¶ 56 (App. 2010) (stating the court should not construe one contractual term in a way that renders another meaningless) (citation omitted); Gesina v. Gen.

Co., ¶ 56 (App. 2010) (“It is a cardinal rule of contract interpretation that we do not construe one term of a contract to essentially render meaningless another term.”).

Co., ¶ 17 (App. 2010) (“In construing a contract, we ‘give words their ordinary, common sense meaning.’”) (quoting A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control Dist.

Co., ¶ 17 (App. 2010) (quoting Sparks v. Republic Nat’l Life Ins.

Co., ¶ 60 (App. 2010) (citing Nat'l Broker Assoc., Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc., ¶ 38 (App. 2005)).

Co., ¶ 45, (applying similar principles to contract interpretation).

Co., ¶ 17 (App. 2010) (“In construing a contract, we ‘give words their ordinary, common sense meaning.’”) (citation omitted).

Co., ¶ 17 (App. 2010) (quoting A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control Dist.