Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Patterson v. Patterson, 248 P.3d 204.

25 citing documents.

Tillman v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Guidelines § IX(B); ¶ 5 (App. 2011).
Polich v. Polich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Collier v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ryan v. Rubalcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ryan v. Rubalcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 9 (App. 2016); –59, ¶¶ 4, 7 (App. 2011).
Nardini-Smith v. Jolly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nardini-Smith v. Jolly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 9 (App. 2016); –59, ¶¶ 4, 7 (App. 2011).
Carey v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sherman, 241 Ariz. at 113, ¶ 9; –59, ¶¶ 4, 7 (App. 2011).
Lavicka v. Lavicka Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Dole v. Dole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dole v. Dole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ortiz v. Diejuez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sherman, 241 Ariz. at 113, ¶ 9; -59, ¶¶ 4, 7 (App. 2011).
Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lynum v. Tavares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Guidelines § 5(D); –60, ¶ 10 (App. 2011).
Clark v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
We review de novo the family court’s application of the Guidelines, Engle, 221 Ariz. at 510, ¶ 21, and interpret the Guidelines in the same way as statutes, ¶ 4 (App. 2011).
Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The Guidelines authorize the family court to deviate from them when application would be “inappropriate or unjust in the particular case.” Guidelines § 20(A)(1), (2); ¶ 5
Kotara v. Franco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Chavez v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
McCammon v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Milinovich v. Womack 343 P.3d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Milinovich v. Womack 343 P.3d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Beres v. Beres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Hanson v. Whetten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mejia v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
P.3d 204 (App. 2011), in its order to calculate his gross income and amend his child support obligation.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by