Cited by

¶ 17 (App. 2012) (“Arizona courts possess inherent authority to curtail a vexatious litigant’s ability to initiate 7 STATE v. PETRAMALA Decision of the Court additional lawsuits.”).

§ 33– 811(C); ¶ 15, (holding that a party waives any challenges to a trustee’s sale, apart from lack of notice of the sale, by failing to obtain injunctive relief prior to the sale).

Co. of Ariz., ¶ 10, (waiver of claims to title), ¶ 15, (waiver of claims dependent upon the sale)).

.” ¶ 11, “[t]he plain language of § 33-811(C) does not require the trustee to comply with the mailing requirements of § 33-809 for the waiver provision to apply later to the trustor.” There, we held that service of the notice of 3

The notice [of trustee’s sale] shall be addressed to the mailing address specified in the trust deed.”) ¶13 ¶¶ 11–12, this court “recognize[d] that .

Co. of Ariz., ¶ 10 , and also waives any claims that are dependent on *24 the sale, ¶ 15

§ 33-811(C); ¶ 15, (holding that a party waives any challenges to a trustee’s sale, apart from lack of notice of the sale, by failing to obtain injunctive relief prior to the sale).

-13, ¶¶ 1, 5, 8-15 , -638 (App.2012) (interpreting A.R.S.

-12, ¶¶ 1, 7, 10 , -37 (App.2012) (damages claims against purchasers for conversion, fraud, and trespass waived because defenses and objections to sale were waived, and sale was the basis for the tort claims).