Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Walsh v. Walsh, 286 P.3d 1095.

84 citing documents.

  • Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Driss v. Driss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Driss v. Driss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    at 338; see also Molloy, 181 Ariz. at 153 (rejecting argument that excess earnings is “the only proper method to value goodwill” and holding “[a] court is not required to use any one specific method to value goodwill”); ¶¶ 20–21 (App. 2012).
  • Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (citation omitted).
  • Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2015); ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
  • Jimenez v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Jimenez v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    “[G]oodwill is essentially reputation that will probably generate future business.” ¶ 11 (App. 2012) (citations omitted).
  • Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 17 (App. 2015); ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
  • Nia v. Nia 396 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Nia v. Nia 396 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 24 , ( , ) (“We will reverse only if the complaining party suffers prejudice as a result of the error.
  • Bachrach v. Bachrach Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Bachrach v. Bachrach Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Haddad v. Geegieh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Haddad v. Geegieh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶ 2 (App. 2016) (citation omitted); ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (citations omitted).
  • Alvarado v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Alvarado v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    "A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion[.]" ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Senter v. Senter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Senter v. Senter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    and [we] ‘will not disturb [the] trial court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous.’” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) ( ).
  • Kittel v. Kittel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Kittel v. Kittel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶ 9, (“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion.”) (internal quotations and citation omitted).
  • Ledo v. Ledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Ledo v. Ledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Moreover, we review legal issues and the application of law de novo.” ¶ 9
  • Iuliano v. Wloch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Iuliano v. Wloch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Pachtman v. Pachtman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Pachtman v. Pachtman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “‘The valuation of assets is a factual determination that must be based on the facts and circumstances of each case.’” ¶ 9, ( ).
  • Nash v. Nash 307 P.3d 40 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
  • Nash v. Nash 307 P.3d 40 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
    ¶ 32 , Guidelines, ¶ 5(G).