Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Walsh v. Walsh, 286 P.3d 1095.

84 citing documents.

  • Crook v. Crook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Crook v. Crook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
  • Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
  • Smith v. Harter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Smith v. Harter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 17 (App. 2022); ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
  • Barnum v. Barnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Barnum v. Barnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (“We will reverse only if the complaining party suffers prejudice as a result of the error.
  • Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    –95 ¶¶ 26–27 (App. 2012).
  • Bondurant v. Yelle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Bondurant v. Yelle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (a court abuses its discretion if it commits a substantial error of law).
  • Kane v. Kane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Kane v. Kane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (“Not all errors in the superior court warrant reversal [].
  • Zennaro v. Zennaro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Zennaro v. Zennaro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    We view the evidence in the light most favorable to supporting the superior court’s decision, ¶ 9 (App. 2012), and uphold its decision if supported by substantial evidence
  • Benninghoff v. Benninghoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Benninghoff v. Benninghoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Garza v. Collinsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Garza v. Collinsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    “We will reverse only if the complaining party suffers prejudice as a result of the error.” ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (citation omitted).
  • In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L. 536 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L. 536 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (stating this court will reverse only if a party suffers prejudice from the error, and the prejudice “appear[s] affirmatively from the record”) (internal quotation marks omitted).
  • Litmath v. US Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Litmath v. US Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (stating not all errors warrant reversal; this court will reverse only if a party suffers prejudice from the error, and the prejudice “appear[s] affirmatively from the record”).
  • Alexander v. Stadsklev Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Alexander v. Stadsklev Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    The value of an asset “is a factual determination that must be based on the facts and circumstances of each case.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (citation omitted).
  • Rahimian v. Rahimian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Rahimian v. Rahimian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (citation omitted).
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Law P. 86 (“At every stage of the proceeding, the court must disregard all errors and defects that do not affect any party’s substantial rights.”); ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (not all errors warrant reversal; this court will reverse only if a party suffers prejudice from the error, and the prejudice “appear[s] affirmatively in the record”).
  • Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding
  • Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 “We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
  • Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Olson v. Olson, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Olson v. Olson, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Hinton v. Hinton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Hinton v. Hinton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Stevens v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Stevens v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quotations omitted).
  • Morris v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Morris v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    We review de novo the superior court’s classification of community and separate property, Pownall, 197 Ariz. at 581, ¶ 15, but uphold its factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
  • Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019