Cited by

¶ 7 (App. 2013) (“In some circumstances, mandamus may be used to compel a public officer to perform a discretionary act, but not to exercise that discretion in any particular manner.”); see also Ariz. Republican Party, 257 Ariz. at 245, ¶ 21 (“If such officer is not specifically required to perform the duty or h

“[W]e accept as true the well-pled facts alleged in the complaint and affirm only if the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any interpretation of the facts susceptible of proof.” ¶ 6 (App. 2013).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 The allegations in the operative complaint, accepted as true for purposes of this appeal, ¶ 6 (App. 2013), establish that in September 2018, Wallschlaeger fell and was injured while on the premises of one of the District’s schools.

¶ 6 (App. 2013) (statutory interpretation is a question of law).

¶ 13 (2018); ¶ 6 (App. 2013).

Blankenbaker v. Marks , , ¶ 6

at 418, 783 P.2d at 1210; ¶ 6