Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Rudinsky v. Harris, 290 P.3d 1218.
- CHOPKO v. FIDELITY NATIONAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
CHOPKO v. FIDELITY NATIONAL
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
§ 12-341.01.” ¶ 27 (App. 2012).
- Lucky Horse v. Yarbrough Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Lucky Horse v. Yarbrough Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Eli v. Procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Eli v. Procaccianti
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Because Procaccianti’s application for attorneys’ fees included detailed time entries and a supporting affidavit, “the burden shifted to [the Homeowners] to demonstrate that particular entries were inappropriate or unreasonable.” ¶ 33 (App. 2012).
- Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Moldovan v. Long
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
–02 ¶¶ 27–30 (App. 2012) (applying A.R.S.
- Andrich v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Andrich v. Allen
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 32 (App. 2012) (in opposing the fee application, "the party asserting financial hardship has the burden of coming forward with prima facie evidence of financial hardship") (cleaned up).
- State v. On-Auk-Mor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
State v. On-Auk-Mor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(holding the court cannot consider issues raised for the first time on appeal); ¶ 15 (App. 1998) (holding an issue raised for the first time in the reply brief is waived); ¶ 14 (App. 2012) (“A party who fails to respond to a motion for summary judgment .
- Risas Holdings v. Tackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Risas Holdings v. Tackett
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 27 (App. 2012) (“Even when a contract is alleged by a plaintiff and the defendant successfully proves that there was no contract, the action is considered to have arisen out of contract for purposes of A.R.S.
- Mac Properties v. Dd Dunlap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Mac Properties v. Dd Dunlap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Woensdregt v. Handyman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Woensdregt v. Handyman
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 32 (App. 2012); (“[T]he party asserting financial hardship has the burden of coming forward with prima facie evidence of financial hardship.”).
- SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith 436 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
-
SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith
436 P.3d 519
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
Rudinsky v. Harris , , ¶ 27
- Isgro v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Isgro v. Wells Fargo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 32 (App. 2012) (“[T]he party asserting financial hardship has the burden of coming forward with prima facie evidence of financial hardship.”).
- Bell & 63rd v. Auto-Owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Bell & 63rd v. Auto-Owners
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 27 (App. 2012) (“We will not disturb the trial court’s discretionary award of fees if there is any reasonable basis for it.”).
- Ryan v. Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Ryan v. Henry
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 27 (App. 2012) (action considered to have arisen out of contract when plaintiff asserts a contract); Associated Indem.
- Lakeside v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Lakeside v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Wilson v. Pnc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Wilson v. Pnc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Abbott v. Banner Health Network 341 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Abbott v. Banner Health Network
341 P.3d 478
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶27 , (holding that when plaintiff alleges a contract and the defendant successfully proves there was no contract, the action is considered to have arisen out of contract for purposes of AR.S.
- Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Austin v. W. Surprise
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
We will not reverse such an award absent an abuse of discretion, and “[w]e will not disturb the trial court’s discretionary award of fees if there is any reasonable basis for it.” ¶ 27
- ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- McQuality v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- McQuality v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Cooper v. Motta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Cooper v. Motta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014