Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Boyle v. Boyle, 290 P.3d 456.
- In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
- In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
- Young v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Young v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Marinello v. Glover Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Marinello v. Glover Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Snook v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Snook v. Aguilar
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
And the family court expressly rejected Husband's accountings of the parties' expenses as separate or community, finding "no basis for how expenses are itemized other than Husband's own personal opinion."3 Accordingly, because the record does not support the court's ruling, ¶ 8 (App. 2012) (stating that the superior court abuses its discretion by making a discretionary ruling the record does not support), we vacate the orders directing Wife to reimburse Husband for $10,000 in separate expenses s
- Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 8 (App. 2012) (citing Gutierrez, 193 Ariz. at 348, ¶ 14).
- Sherman v. Sherman 384 P.3d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Sherman v. Sherman 384 P.3d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Grubb v. Thraikill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Grubb v. Thraikill
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“A family court abuses its discretion by making an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, or making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support.” ¶ 8 (App. 2012) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2008), ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).
- Fuller v. Fuller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Fuller v. Fuller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Kambourian v. Kambourian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Kambourian v. Kambourian
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
4 KAMBOURIAN v. KAMBOURIAN Decision of the Court law in reaching a discretionary decision, ¶ 8 (App. 2012).
- Tumlinson v. Tumlinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Tumlinson v. Tumlinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- McNeil v. Hoskyns 337 P.3d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- McNeil v. Hoskyns 337 P.3d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014