Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Boyle v. Boyle, 290 P.3d 456.
- Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Stevenson v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Stevenson v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Barnum v. Barnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Barnum v. Barnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Howard v. Howard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Howard v. Howard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Howie v. Howie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Howie v. Howie
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 8 (App. 2012) (citation omitted) (noting that a court abuses its discretion by “making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support”); (holding when the trial court identifies “[n]o grounds for its action .
- Searles v. Wolfe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Searles v. Wolfe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Valasekova v. Fedor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Valasekova v. Fedor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“An error of law constitutes an abuse of discretion,” ¶ 9 (2015), as does an order unsupported by the record, ¶ 8 (App. 2012).
- Murray v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Murray v. Murray
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no competent evidence to 2 MURRAY v. MURRAY Decision of the Court support the court’s decision, ¶ 5 (1999), or when the court makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision, ¶ 8 (App. 2012).
- Harris v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Harris v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Jones v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Jones v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Schultz v. Schultz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Schultz v. Schultz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Dion v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Dion v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
-
David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman
Ariz. 2022
“An error of law constitutes an abuse of discretion,” ¶ 9 (2015), as does an order unsupported by the record, ¶ 8 (App. 2012).
- Van Zilen v. Bouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Van Zilen v. Bouse
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 16 (App. 2009); ¶ 15 (App. 2012) (We may infer additional findings necessary to sustain a judgment when the evidence reasonably supports such conclusions and the inferred finding does not conflict with an express finding.).
- Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Smith v. Smith
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 9 (App. 2012) (emphasis added).
- Scheirer v. Scheirer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Scheirer v. Scheirer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
We review the court’s decision for an abuse of discretion, 2 ¶ 13 (App. 2007), and will affirm the decision unless it is unsupported by record evidence or the court legally erred, ¶ 8 (App. 2012).
- Burkett v. Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Burkett v. Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Vartanian v. Vartanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Vartanian v. Vartanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Hovda v. Hovda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Hovda v. Hovda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Silva v. Silva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Silva v. Silva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Ortiz v. Diejuez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Ortiz v. Diejuez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Wethe v. Wethe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Wethe v. Wethe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Carter v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Carter v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Bowles v. Trznadel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Bowles v. Trznadel
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 8 (App. 2012) (“A family court abuses its 5 BOWLES, et al. v. TRZNADEL Decision of the Court discretion by .
- Wilson v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Wilson v. Wilson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2012)).