Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Nash v. Nash, 307 P.3d 40.
-
Clark v. Clark
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.8, ¶ 22 (App. 2013) (explaining that child support in excess of the standard needs of the children is not necessarily in children’s best interests).
- Lambesis v. Lambesis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Lambesis v. Lambesis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Goodman v. Forsen 366 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Goodman v. Forsen 366 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Streeter v. Visor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Streeter v. Visor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
–82, ¶ 32, –49 (App. 2013).
- Lynch v. Brakebill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Lynch v. Brakebill
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶37 By statute, “[t]he party seeking a sum greater [than the presumptive amount] shall bear the burden of proof that the needs of the children require a greater sum.” Guidelines § 8; ¶ 18
- Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Stevens v. Yohannes
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Father argues the court was required to include the amount he paid for the child’s ¶ 11