Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Christopher K. v. Markaa S., 311 P.3d 1110.

108 citing documents.

Manola v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Manola v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶17 Additionally, “the absence of findings concerning domestic violence constitutes an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 19
Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 25-403(A) factors, however, is not waived by a party’s failure to raise the issue; “[t]his is because the findings requirement not only allows effective appellate review, but also provides the superior court with necessary baseline information against which to measure future petitions for changes in [legal decision-making].” n.6 ¶ 18, n.6 (App. 2013) (citing Reid, 222 Ariz. at 208-10 ¶¶ 3 Although Mother relies on A.R.S.
Sahlin v. Hon fridlund-horne/hartfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sahlin v. Hon fridlund-horne/hartfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In determining whether there is adequate cause, “the court must first determine whether there has been a change in circumstances materially affecting the child’s welfare.” ¶ 15, see Pridgeon, 134 Ariz. at 179, 655 P. 2d at 3.
McNeil v. Goff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McNeil v. Goff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 15, (“We review the superior court’s decision on child custody for abuse of discretion.”).