Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Christopher K. v. Markaa S., 311 P.3d 1110.

104 citing documents.

Gurule v. Mays Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Gurule v. Mays Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 18 (App. 2013); A.R.S.
Beasterfield v. Del Bosque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Beasterfield v. Del Bosque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Christopher K v. Markaa S., ¶ 15 (App. 2013).
Schneider v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Schneider v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Mesa v. O'Connor 563 P.3d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Mesa v. O'Connor 563 P.3d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
in accordance with the best interests of the child.”); -02, ¶¶ 20-23 (App. 2013) (A court must explain its evaluation of the evidence in the best interests finding.).
Washum v. Paskett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Washum v. Paskett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 18 (App. 2013); ¶ 11 (App. 2013).
Murphy v. Stidham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Murphy v. Stidham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 15 (App. 2013) (citations omitted).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 20 (App. 2013) (“Though the court may consider an expert’s opinion, .
Griebel v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Griebel v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Atkison v. Shafer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Decormier v. Cormier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Decormier v. Cormier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶26 Section 25-403(A)(8) (2013) requires the court to consider “[w]hether there has been domestic violence or child abuse pursuant to § 25-403.03.” “Child abuse may include the infliction of physical injury or emotional damage.” ¶ 17 (App. 2013) (citing A.R.S.
Atkison v. Shafer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
§ 25-403.03(B); ¶ 16 (App. 2013).
Ryan v. Rubalcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ryan v. Rubalcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michaels v. Shimo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michaels v. Shimo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
§ 25-403(A).” ¶ 18 (App. 2013).
Rosenberg v. Conzoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Rosenberg v. Conzoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ali v. Elsied Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ali v. Elsied Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 15 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
Nardini-Smith v. Jolly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nardini-Smith v. Jolly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
McGuire-lally v. Lally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
McGuire-lally v. Lally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Daurio v. Daurio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Daurio v. Daurio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 15 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
Johnson v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Johnson v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kennedy v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Kennedy v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brown v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brown v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Wheeler v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Wheeler v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 15 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
Frederick v. Barreira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Frederick v. Barreira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Johnson v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Johnson v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 15 (App. 2013) (); ¶ 16 (App. 2003) (); ¶ 17 (App. 2015) (quoting Canty, 178 Ariz. at 448).
Hinton v. Hinton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Hinton v. Hinton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
are for the court alone to decide.”); –02, ¶¶ 21–23 (App. 2013) (vacating order concerning legal decision-making 13 HINTON v. HINTON Decision of the Court and parenting time where court incorporated expert witness’ findings “by reference” and made no inde