DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance, 340 P.3d 405.

70 citing documents.

  • Becker v. Liu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Becker v. Liu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Co., ¶ 14 (App. 2014) (“We will affirm summary judgment if it is correct for any reason supported by the record, even if not explicitly considered by the superior court.”).
  • Shafer v. Walgreen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Shafer v. Walgreen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    We will affirm entry of summary judgment if correct for any reason supported by the record, “even if not explicitly considered by the superior court.” KB Home Tucson, ¶ 14 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
  • Odigwe v. Stone Oaks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Odigwe v. Stone Oaks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Co., ¶ 14 (App. 2014), we first consider de novo whether the Odigwes’ claims are barred by claim preclusion.
  • Enterprising v. Ellis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Enterprising v. Ellis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Co., n.7, ¶ 30 (App. 4 ENTERPRISING v. ELLIS, et al. Decision of the Court 2014) (explaining that a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation requires “resulting damage”).
  • Westover v. Wees Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Westover v. Wees Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    KB Home Tucson, ¶ 14 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2006)).
  • East Valley v. Mahoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • East Valley v. Mahoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Calabrese v. Fortin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Calabrese v. Fortin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    We will affirm the granting of a motion for summary judgment if correct for any reason supported by the record, “even if not explicitly considered by the superior court.”6 KB Home Tucson, ¶ 14 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
  • Camelback v. Cbre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Camelback v. Cbre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Co., ¶ 30 n.7 (App. 2014) (stating elements of negligent misrepresentation claim).
  • Brown v. Jcl Network Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Brown v. Jcl Network Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Co., ¶ 14, (citation omitted).
  • Stazenski v. Coughlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Stazenski v. Coughlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Co., -33, ¶ 30, -12 (App. 2014) (stating elements of claim for negligent misrepresentation and reaffirming that claim is governed by principles of law of negligence requiring damages resulting from breach of duty).