Cited by

¶ 10 (App. 2014) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

DISCUSSION ¶8 We review an order of protection for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 10 (App. 2014), and review evidentiary rulings for a clear abuse of discretion and substantial prejudice, Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young

Viewing the facts “in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision,” we will reverse only if the record “is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 10 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the order of protection for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 10 (App. 2014), and the evidentiary rulings are reviewed for a clear abuse of discretion and substantial prejudice, Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young

We will reverse only if “the record, when viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 10 (App. 2014).

¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“[G]ranting an order of protection when the allegations fail to include a statutorily enumerated offense constitutes error by the court.”); see A.R.S.

an injunction.'" Id.; -59, ¶¶ 5, 7-8 (App. 2014) (finding a final order of protection containing a firearm prohibition appealable under A.R.S.

§ 13- 3602(G)(4); ¶ 20 (App. 2014).

“We review a protective order for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 10 (App. 2014) (citing Cardoso, 230 Ariz. at 619, ¶¶ 15-16).

The court abuses its discretion “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support [it].” ¶ 10 (App. 2014) (internal citation and quotation omitted).

The court “abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support [it].” ¶ 10 (App. 2014) (quotation omitted).

§ 13-3602(E) (court may issue ex parte order of protection if it determines there is reasonable cause to believe a defendant has committed or may commit an act of domestic violence); ¶ 14 (App. 2014) (for purposes of the statute governing orders of protection, “domestic violence” is defined under A.R.S.

¶ 16 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

¶ 16 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 6 (App. 1999)).

¶ 10 (App. 2014).1 ¶5 A court shall issue an order of protection if it determines there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may commit an act of domestic violence or has committed an act of domestic violence within the past year.