Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Savord v. Morton, 330 P.3d 1013.
- Nicaise v. Sundaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Lite v. Lite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Lite v. Lite
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
3 ¶ 11 (App. 2014), does not support this conclusion.
- Gunderson v. Gunderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Gunderson v. Gunderson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 10 (App. 2014).1 "We defer to the judge with respect to any factual findings explicitly or implicitly made, affirming them so long as they are supported by reasonable evidence."
- Fordyce v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Fordyce v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Gonzales v. Vargas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The court “abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or ‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support it.’” ¶10 (App. 2014) ( ¶14 (App. 2012)).
- Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Phillips v. Cabrera
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 16 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 6 (App. 1999)).
- Camargo v. Camargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Camargo v. Camargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Fisher v. Fisher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Fisher v. Fisher
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶8 “[G]ranting an order of protection when the allegations fail to include a statutorily enumerated offense constitutes error by the court.” ¶ 11, see also A.R.S.
- Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Minch v. Azbn
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 16 (App. 2014); Carlson v. Ariz. State Pers.
- Martha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Martha C. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 36 (App. 2016) (citing In re 1996 Nissan Sentra, ¶ 7 (App. 2001), ¶ 9 (App. 2014)).
- Klien v. York Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Klien v. York
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 36 (App. 2016) (citing In re 1996 Nissan Sentra, ¶ 7 (App. 2001), ¶ 9 (App. 2014)).
- Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Chereka v. Gadissa
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
2 CHEREKA v. GADISSA Decision of the Court DISCUSSION ¶5 “We review an order of protection for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 10 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
- Grubb v. Thraikill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Grubb v. Thraikill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Leone v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Leone v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
-
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines
366 P.3d 111
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
We could consider TEPOA’s failure to respond to this argument to be a confession of error, see In re 1996 Nissan Sentra, but in our discretion we do not do so
- Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- Bastian v. Endresen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Bastian v. Endresen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Mayol v. Rowlls Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Mayol v. Rowlls
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 16 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 6 (App. 1999)).
- Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Morrison v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Morrison v. Bennett
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶4 We review the court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 10, but view the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the ruling.
- Orlando v. Hon. butner/hargrove Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Orlando v. Hon. butner/hargrove
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
An abuse of discretion occurs when the court “makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 10, (internal quotation omitted).