Cited by

“We review the [superior] court’s findings of fact for an abuse of discretion.” Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 22 (App. 2015).

See Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 36 (App. 2015) (“Both the existence and amount of lost profits present questions of fact which must be proven with reasonable certainty.”); S. Union Co. v. Sw.

Further, we defer to the “court’s superior position to weigh the evidence, make credibility determinations, and resolve conflicts in facts.” Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 42 (App. 2015).

¶ 13 (App. 1998); Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 42 (App. 2015).

See Great W. Bank v. LJC, Dev., LLC, ¶ 22 (App. 2015) (“Where there is conflicting evidence, we do not substitute our judgment for the [superior] court’s and will reverse only where the findings are clearly erroneous.”).

See Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, 479, 481–82, ¶¶ 7, 30, 41–42 (App. 2015) (holding evidence sufficient where market reports showed that construction borrower would have completed a profitable development had lender not wrongfully terminated financing); –08, ¶ 54 (App. 2010) (holding evid

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 22 (App. 2015).

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 22 (App. 2015).

According to Burnett, Smith’s daughter moved the car, albeit because Burnett had told Smith “to give [her] back the keys.” In reconciling these discrepancies, “we defer to the trial court’s superior position to weigh the evidence, make credibility determinations, and resolve conflicts in facts.” See Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 42 (App. 2015).

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 22 (App. 2015).

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., L.L.C., ¶ 22 (App. 2015) (citing Myers v. W. Realty & Constr., Inc., ).

¶14 “Generally, the non-breaching party to a loan agreement” can recover as damages “the amount that would place him in the same position in which he would have been had the contract been performed.” Great Western Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, –81 ¶ 36 (App. 2015).

Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC, ¶ 23 (App. 2015) (construction loans).

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 9 (App. 2015).

¶ 8 (App. 2019) (recognizing a tacit finding necessary to sustain the family court’s order) (citing Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., L.L.C., ¶ 31 n.9 (App. 2015)).

See Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., L.L.C., ¶ 31 n.9 (App. 2015) (“[W]e presume the trial court made all findings necessary to sustain the judgment if they are ‘reasonably supported by the evidence, and not in conflict with 3 Although Wife did not reference Rule 85(b) in her filings, a party need not file a specific motion to invoke the rule.

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 22 (App. 2015).

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 21 (App. 2015).

Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, n.1 (App. 2015); Citibank (Ariz.) v. Van Velzer, ¶ 5 (App. 1998).

But “we defer to the trial court’s superior position to weigh the evidence, make credibility determinations, and resolve conflicts in facts and expert opinions.” Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 42 (App. 2015).

¶ 11 (2006); Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 9 (App. 2015).

We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the superior court’s judgment, Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, n.1 (App. 2015), upholding it if it is correct for any reason.

5 COMMERCE et al. v. ZINKE et al. Decision of the Court (evidence was sufficient to support judgment on property’s rental value where there “was no direct testimony as to its rental value,” but there was other relevant testimony, including “the approximate number of acres” of the property); Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 41 (App. 2015) (“Reasonable certainty is therefore provided where there is ‘some reasonable method of computing [the] net loss.’”) (citation omitted).

Ctr., ¶ 15 (App. 2010), but reviews factual findings for an abuse of discretion, see Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 22 (App. 2015).

Savings & Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 44 (App. 2015) (awarding prevailing party attorneys’ fees under A.R.S.