Cited by

This court clarified as much in Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 14 (App. 2017).

See Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, (remanding to trial court to resolve factual question of when limitations period commenced).

§ 12-542; see also Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 9 (App. 2017).

See Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, -49 ¶ 34 (2017).

DISCUSSION ¶5 “We review de novo the superior court’s grant of summary judgment, including its assessment of the existence of factual disputes and its application of the law.” Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23 (App. 2017).

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23 (App. 2017).

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 30 (App. 2017).

We review a summary judgment ruling de novo, Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23 (App. 2017), viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.

We review a summary judgment ruling de novo, Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23 (App. 2017), viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered and considering only the evidence presented in the summary judgment record.

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23 (App. 2017).

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 9 (App. 2017) (citing A.R.S.

§ 12-542; Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 9 (App. 2017) (“A two-year limitations period applies to claims for breach of fiduciary duty.”).

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23 (App. 2017).

Although the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, “claims that are clearly brought outside the relevant limitations period are conclusively barred.” Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, (quoting Montaño v. Browning, ); cf. Garza v. Swift Transp.

Co., 758 F.2d 409, 414-15 (9th Cir. 1985) (abuse of process); Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 9 (App. 2017) (breach of fiduciary duty); Rowland v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 210 Ariz. 5 FLORES v. JOHNSON Decision of the Court 530, 532, ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (negligence); (App

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 7 4 GHB v. SOLOMON, et al. Decision of the Court (App. 2017).

“We review de novo the superior court’s grant of summary judgment, including its assessment of the existence of factual disputes and its application of the law.” Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23 (App. 2017).

§ 12-543(3) (setting a three-year limitations period for fraud claims); Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 9 (App. 2017) (explaining the two-year limitations period of A.R.S.

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 9 (App. 2017).

Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 23