Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lee v. ING Investment Management, LLC, 377 P.3d 355.

40 citing documents.

  • Gipson v. Shinnink Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Gipson v. Shinnink Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 10 (App. 2016) (noting, where partial summary judgment precluded party “from recovering a significant portion of the damages he sought” and an offer of judgment was accepted obviating a jury trial, “[i]n light of the totality of the litigation, there is a reasonable basis for the superior court’s” successful pa
  • Panto v. Sines Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Panto v. Sines Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2016).
  • Deatcher v. Drake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Deatcher v. Drake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    3 DEATCHER v. DRAKE Decision of the Court ¶ 8 (App. 2017).
  • Mago v. Arizona Escrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Mago v. Arizona Escrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Lee v. ING Investment Management, LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
  • Lane v. Statesman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Lane v. Statesman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2016) (explaining the determination of “successful party” under § 12–341.01 is within the trial court’s discretion, which will not be disturbed if any reasonable support exists); Assyia v. State Farm Mut.
  • Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
  • Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 10 (App. 2016) (“Partial success does not preclude a party from ‘prevailing’ and receiving a discretionary award of attorneys’ fees”) (quotation omitted) (quoting Berry v. 352 E. Va., LLC, ¶¶ 23–24 (App. 2011)).
  • Risas Holdings v. Tackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Risas Holdings v. Tackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 10 (App. 2016) (“Partial success does not preclude a party from ‘prevailing’ and receiving a discretionary award of attorneys’ fees; the superior court may find that a party is the successful party even when the recovery it obtains is significantly reduced.” (internal quotations omitted)).
  • Guirguis v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Guirguis v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2016); Schwartz v. Farmers Ins.
  • Carroll v. Carroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Carroll v. Carroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
  • Hovannisian v. Hovannisian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Hovannisian v. Hovannisian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
  • Riedel v. Fuentes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Riedel v. Fuentes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
  • Klarkowski v. Define Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Klarkowski v. Define Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶¶ 9– 4 KLARKOWSKI, et al. v. DEFINE, et al. Decision of the Court 10 (App. 2016).
  • Southwest v. Sbbi, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Southwest v. Sbbi, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 10 (App. 2016) (providing a party may be successful for purposes of A.R.S.
  • Ansley v. Banner Health 419 P.3d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Ansley v. Banner Health 419 P.3d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
  • Hta-Scw v. Roskamp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Hta-Scw v. Roskamp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 10 (App. 2016).
  • Hernandez v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Hernandez v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2016) (appellate court will not disturb trial court’s award of attorney fees if there is any reasonable basis for it).
  • Evou v. All In Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Evou v. All In Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 8, (citations omitted).
  • McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 22 (2016) (declining to award fees or costs where both appeal and cross- appeal were unsuccessful).
  • Sabatina v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Sabatina v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Mgmt., LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2016).