Cited by

FLANIGAN v. AZ REG OF CONTRACTORS Decision of the Court 105, ¶ 6 (App. 2016).

¶24 “A party is bound by factual admissions or concessions made in its pleadings.” ¶ 24 (App. 2016) (citation omitted); accord Paul Schoonover, Inc. v. Ram Constr., Inc., (“The admission binds [the party] and is conclusive as to the admitted fact.”).

Comm’n of Ariz., ¶ 10 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 22 (App. 2016)).

in as good a position as he would have been in had the contract been performed.’” ¶ 12 (App. 2016) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 347 cmt.

¶ 6 (App. 2016) (citing First Fin.

“A finding of fact is not clearly erroneous if substantial evidence supports it, even if substantial conflicting evidence exists.” ¶ 22 (App. 2016) (quoting Kocher v. Dep’t of Revenue of Ariz., ¶ 9 (App. 2003)).

Ramsey v. Arizona 6 SW FABRICATION v. PHOENIX, et al. Decision of the Court Registrar of Contractors, ¶ 22 (App. 2016) (“We will not set aside the trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous.”).

¶ 6 (App. 2016); ¶ 15 (App. 2007).

“A finding of fact is not clearly erroneous if substantial evidence supports it, even if substantial conflicting evidence exists.” ¶ 22 (App. 2016) (quoting Kocher v. Dep’t of Revenue of Ariz., ¶ 9 (App. 2003)).

“A finding of fact is not clearly erroneous if substantial evidence supports it, even if substantial conflicting evidence exists.” ¶ 22 (App. 2016) (quotation and citations omitted).

See supra ¶ 11; ¶ 22 (App. 2016) (citing Ariz. R. Civ.