Cited by

¶ 20 (App. 2019); ¶ 18 (App. 2015).

¶37 “On appeal, we do not reweigh the evidence but defer to the family court’s determinations of witness credibility.” ¶ 20 (App. 2019).

This court does not reweigh the evidence presented to the superior court, but instead defers to the court’s “determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.” ¶ 20 (App. 2019).

Although Mother challenged Father’s testimony that the mortgage had been paid off during the marriage and asserted that a balance of $4,205.84 remained at the time of service of the petition, “we do not reweigh the evidence” on appeal and instead “defer to the family court’s determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.” ¶ 20 (App. 2019).

¶ 31 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 13 (App. 1998)); ¶ 16 (App. 2019) (finding that reasonable evidence supported the family court based upon evidence that the husband earned approximately twice of the wife's monthly wage).

¶ 29 (App. 2019) (appellate court reviews attorneys’ fees award for an abuse of discretion).

(“On appeal, we do not reweigh the evidence but defer to the family court’s determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.”) ( ¶ 13 (App. 1998)).

But “we do not reweigh the evidence” on appeal, and instead “defer to the [superior] court’s determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.” ¶ 20 (App. 2019).

¶ 20 (App. 2019) (“On appeal, we do not reweigh the evidence but defer to the family court’s determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.”).

¶ 14 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 13 (App. 2007)).

However, “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to affirming the [superior] court’s ruling and will affirm if the evidence reasonably supports it.” ¶ 14 (App. 2019).

¶ 14 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 13 (App. 2007)).

¶ 29 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 6 (App. 2014)).