Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Quijada v. Quijada, 437 P.3d 876.
- Porteous v. Francies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bibbee v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bibbee v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Porteous v. Francies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Tarascio v. Siebers
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 31 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 13 (App. 1998)); ¶ 16 (App. 2019) (finding that reasonable evidence supported the family court based upon evidence that the husband earned approximately twice of the wife's monthly wage).
- State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Prince v. Prince Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Prince v. Prince Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Williamson v. Williamson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Williamson v. Williamson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 7 n.4 (App. 2019) (noting that Rule 85 motions based on mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud are time-barred if brought more than six months after judgment).
- Love v. Love Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Love v. Love
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“In doing so, we defer to the court’s factual findings so long as there is competent evidence to support them.” ¶ 13 (App. 2019).
- Rychlik v. Sodergren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Rychlik v. Sodergren
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“[W]e defer to the court’s factual findings so long as there is competent evidence to support them.” ¶ 13 (App. 2019).
- Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Imatdinov v. Imatdinov
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“[W]e defer to the court’s factual findings so long as there is competent evidence to support them.” ¶ 13 (App. 2019).
- Rodriguez v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Rodriguez v. Garcia
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 8 (App. 2019) (recognizing a tacit finding necessary to sustain the family court’s order) (citing Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., L.L.C., ¶ 31 n.9 (App. 2015)).
- Schreiner v. Schreiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Schreiner v. Schreiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019