Cited by

ment for “any other reason justifying relief”); Skydive Ariz., ¶ 25 (App. 2015) (providing that relief under a catch-all provision of the analogous civil rule is available when other provisions do not apply and, under the totality of the facts, “extraordinary circumstances of hardship or injustice justifying relief” exist (citation omitted)); ¶ 6 n.3 (App. 2019) (holding that a party need not a file specific motion to invoke Rule 85).

¶ 31 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 13 (App. 1998)); ¶ 16 (App. 2019) (finding that reasonable evidence supported the family court based upon evidence that the husband earned approximately twice of the wife's monthly wage).

¶ 7 n.4 (App. 2019) (noting that Rule 85 motions based on mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud are time-barred if brought more than six months after judgment).

“In doing so, we defer to the court’s factual findings so long as there is competent evidence to support them.” ¶ 13 (App. 2019).

“[W]e defer to the court’s factual findings so long as there is competent evidence to support them.” ¶ 13 (App. 2019).

“[W]e defer to the court’s factual findings so long as there is competent evidence to support them.” ¶ 13 (App. 2019).

¶ 8 (App. 2019) (recognizing a tacit finding necessary to sustain the family court’s order) (citing Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., L.L.C., ¶ 31 n.9 (App. 2015)).