Cited by

“We review the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting-time orders for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 14 (App. 2021); ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

When allegations of a parent’s domestic violence exist, the superior court must make “detailed, specific findings related to legal decision making and parenting time.” ¶ 4 (App. 2019) (citing A.R.S.

DISCUSSION I. Legal Decision-Making and Parenting Time ¶9 “We review the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting time orders for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 14 (App. 4 KRAKANA v. HADDEN Decision of the Court 2021); ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

But that prohibition applies only if the court makes the additional factual finding that the domestic violence was “significant.” & n.6 (App. 2019).

See DeLuna v. 4 ¶¶ 18–19 (App. 2019) (noting that § 25-403(B) requires findings on the record of all relevant factors in legal decision- making and parenting time cases); ¶ 10 (App. 2015) (explaining that we cannot “infer additional findings necessary to sustain the award” where one pa

¶ 5 (App. 2021) (Rule 83 motion); ¶ 9 (App. 2019) (legal decision-making).

“We accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous but review conclusions of law and interpretation of statutes de novo.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 14 (App. 2021); ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 9 (App. 2019); ¶ 11 (App. 2013); (explaining the superior court has “broad discretion in determining what will be the most beneficial for the children” and “is in the best position to determine what is in the children’s

¶ 9 (App. 2019) (legal decision-making and parenting time); ¶ 7 (App. 2021) (child support).

(child support); ¶ 14 (App. 2021) (legal decision-making); ¶ 9 (App. 2019) (parenting time).