DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Deluna v. Petitto, 450 P.3d 1273.

159 citing documents.

  • Huey v. Huey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 9 (App. 2019) (legal decision-making, parenting time); ¶ 5 (App. 2016) (relocation).
  • Gish v. Greyson 514 P.3d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Gish v. Greyson 514 P.3d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 14 (App. 2021); ¶ 9 (App. 2019).
  • Lopez v. Scimone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Lopez v. Scimone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    § 13-3601 or if it “finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a significant history of domestic violence.” ¶9 ¶ 15 n.6 (App. 2019), to evaluate the significance of Father’s domestic violence.
  • Farrell v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Farrell v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 9 (App. 2019); ¶ 17 (App. 2019).
  • Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Servin v. Servin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Servin v. Servin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Ryan v. Rubalcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Ryan v. Rubalcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Landwehr v. Landwehr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Landwehr v. Landwehr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Michaels v. Shimo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Michaels v. Shimo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    A court abuses its discretion if it “commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision or when the record does not support the court’s decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).
  • Rosenberg v. Conzoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Rosenberg v. Conzoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 16 (App. 2019) (ruling an appellate court will not infer § 25-403.A findings); Francine C. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 18 (App. 2020) (ruling parties cannot waive the § 25- 403 statutory-findings requirement) (citing Reid, 222 Ariz. at 210, ¶ 20).
  • Burton v. Groeneveld Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Burton v. Groeneveld Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    An abuse of discretion occurs either “when the record does not support the court’s decision” or “when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).
  • Gallo v. Gallo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gallo v. Gallo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    “We accept the [superior] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous but review conclusions of law and the interpretation of statutes de novo,” ¶ 9 (App. 2019), including Rule 69 agreements and the Arizona Child Support Guidelines, A.R.S.
  • Rodriguez v. Reynolds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Rodriguez v. Reynolds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    An abuse of discretion occurs either “when the record does not support the court’s decision” or “when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).
  • Schritter v. Schritter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Schritter v. Schritter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • McGuire-lally v. Lally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • McGuire-lally v. Lally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶ 3 (App. 2002); ¶ 9 (App. 2019) (defining an abuse of discretion).
  • Principe v. Blevins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Principe v. Blevins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Olesen v. daniel/burge 484 P.3d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Olesen v. daniel/burge 484 P.3d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Ward v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Ward v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Curtis v. Curtis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Curtis v. Curtis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    “We review the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting-time orders for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).
  • Gillette v. Arzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Gillette v. Arzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Pickett v. Borg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Carberry v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Carberry v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    § 25-403; ¶ 11 (App. 4 CARBERRY v. WARD Decision of the Court 2019).
  • Hovannisian v. Hovannisian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    § 25-403.01(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2019).
  • Johnson v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Johnson v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶ 9 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 4 (App. 2018)).
  • Valenzuela v. Sedillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Valenzuela v. Sedillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶8 We review parenting time orders for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 5 (App. 2019), which “occurs when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision,” ¶ 9 (App. 2019), or when “the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision,” ¶ 5 (1999) ().
  • Aguilar v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020