Cited by

A court abuses its discretion if it “commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision or when the record does not support the court’s decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 16 (App. 2019) (ruling an appellate court will not infer § 25-403.A findings); Francine C. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 18 (App. 2020) (ruling parties cannot waive the § 25- 403 statutory-findings requirement) (citing Reid, 222 Ariz. at 210, ¶ 20).

An abuse of discretion occurs either “when the record does not support the court’s decision” or “when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

“We accept the [superior] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous but review conclusions of law and the interpretation of statutes de novo,” ¶ 9 (App. 2019), including Rule 69 agreements and the Arizona Child Support Guidelines, A.R.S.

An abuse of discretion occurs either “when the record does not support the court’s decision” or “when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 3 (App. 2002); ¶ 9 (App. 2019) (defining an abuse of discretion).

“We review the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting-time orders for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

§ 25-403; ¶ 11 (App. 4 CARBERRY v. WARD Decision of the Court 2019).

§ 25-403.01(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2019).

¶ 9 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 4 (App. 2018)).

¶8 We review parenting time orders for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 5 (App. 2019), which “occurs when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision,” ¶ 9 (App. 2019), or when “the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision,” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

Decision of the Court abused its discretion by failing to consider evidence of Father’s drug use, domestic violence, and child neglect; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the March 2019 decision-making and parenting-time order.3 ¶23 “We review the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting-time orders for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 9 (App. 2019) (legal decision-making authority and parenting time); ¶ 6 (App. 2002) (child support).

“If the court finds either the existence of significant domestic violence or a significant history of domestic violence, [§ 25-403.03(A)] precludes an award of joint legal decision-making authority.” ¶ 11 (App. 2019).