Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gonzalez-Gunter v. Gunter, 471 P.3d 1024.

41 citing documents.

  • McAvoy v. Logan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • McAvoy v. Logan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 11 (App. 2020) (as amended).
  • Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶21 The court “has discretion to determine parenting time based on all the evidence before it.” ¶ 11 (App. 2020).
  • Mesa v. O'Connor 563 P.3d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Mesa v. O'Connor 563 P.3d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    The wishes of the parents, of course, may and should be considered, but their happiness and their desires will never be allowed to interfere with the child’s true welfare.”); ¶ 12 (App. 2020); ¶ 18 (App. 2022); J.F.
  • Webber v. Webber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Webber v. Webber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    at 47, ¶ 18 ( ¶¶ 11–12 (App. 2020).
  • Schritter v. Schritter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Schritter v. Schritter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Schneider v. Perea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Schneider v. Perea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Garza v. Collinsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Garza v. Collinsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶ 15 (App. 2020) (affirming modification of parenting time orders to reduce father’s parenting time based on court’s findings, inter alia, “that the [parents] had difficulty communicating” and that father “took the children out of state without [the mother’s] permission”).
  • Windschill v. Windschill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Windschill v. Windschill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    We review parenting time orders for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 11 (App. 2013), but review questions of statutory interpretation de novo, ¶ 9 (App. 2020).
  • Troutman v. Troutman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Troutman v. Troutman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Whisenand v. Whisenand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Whisenand v. Whisenand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Oaklief v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Oaklief v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 9 (App. 2020) (as amended); ¶ 7 (App. 2003).
  • Van Zilen v. Bouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Van Zilen v. Bouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 13 (App. 2020); ¶ 18 (App. 2016).
  • Dole v. Dole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Dole v. Dole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Little, 193 Ariz. at 520 ¶ 5; ¶ 17 (App. 2020) (finding that the record reflected that Father said during a deposition that he would pay “a hundred a month” or “1200 per year” for “each child’s gymnastics classes and that his statements were placed on the record in accordance with [Rule] 69(a)(2)”).
  • Hanger v. Hanger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Hanger v. Hanger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 11 (App. 2020) (as amended).
  • Dineyazhe v. Onco-Ingyadet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Dineyazhe v. Onco-Ingyadet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    § 25- 403.02; ¶ 12 (App. 2020).
  • Van Camp v. Van Camp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Van Camp v. Van Camp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶ 4 (App. 2020); ¶ 9 (App. 2020).
  • Knight v. Knight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    We review an order modifying parenting time for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 9 (App. 2020) (as amended), and defer to the family court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, ¶ 4 (App. 2018).
  • Ward v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Ward v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    However, none of these statutes guarantee that any parent will have exactly equal parenting time, even in the absence of evidence of “parental unfitness or endangerment.” ¶¶ 11–12 (App. 2020).
  • Douros v. Douros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Douros v. Douros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    § 25-103(B)(1) “does not require equal parenting time,” and the superior court still may “determine parenting time based on all the evidence before it.” ¶¶ 11-12 (App. 2020).
  • Kennedy v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Kennedy v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    But these statutes do not require equal parenting time, even if the court does not find evidence of “parental unfitness or endangerment.” ¶¶ 11-12 (App. 2020).
  • Cash v. Cash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Cash v. Cash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020