Cited by

¶ 14 (App. 2021) (“We construe all reasonable inferences in favor of sustaining the court’s decision.”).

§ 25-318(C); ¶ 26 (App. 2021).

The court commits an abuse of discretion when it “rules without competent evidence or commits a legal error in making a discretionary decision.” ¶ 12 (App. 2021).

See, ¶ 1 (App. 2021) (finding remand appropriate when the court could not discern whether the division of assets was fair and equitable).

“While community property generally implies equal ownership between both spouses, and an equal distribution may often be the most equitable, ‘there may be sound reason to divide the property otherwise.’” ¶ 13 (App. 2021) (citing Toth, 190 Ariz. at 221).

the husband challenged the court’s valuation of a jointly owned business as of the time of service of the petition for dissolution, arguing that the valuation date failed to account for a “significant” loss in value that the business experienced “after the divorce proceedings began.” Id.

See, ¶ 31 (App. 2021) (determine value of business interest and order equitable payment to wife); Dole v. Blair in & for Cnty.

“[T]he superior court has wide discretion to choose a business’s valuation date, so long as the ultimate valuation is equitable.” ¶ 18 (App. 2021).

An abuse of discretion occurs when a court “rules without competent evidence or commits a legal error in making a discretionary decision.” ¶ 12 (App. 2021).

“[I]n a dissolution proceeding the superior court has wide discretion to choose a business’s valuation date, so long as the ultimate valuation is equitable.” ¶ 18 (App. 2021).