Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Able Distributing Co. v. James Lampe, 773 P.2d 504.

33 citing documents.

state/solano v. Zamora Felix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Hj Ventures v. candelario/carmax Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Hj Ventures v. candelario/carmax Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Contractor, (“In order to determine the liability of the garnishee, a court must look to the facts as they were found to exist at the time the writ was served.”).
Spore v. Campeau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Spore v. Campeau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Contractor, Stoddard, 224 Ariz. at 154, ¶ 9.
Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Contractor , , 409, (reviewing court presumes trial court considered admitted evidence).
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mfc v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mfc v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Contractor, (“[A] contractual provision generally should not be construed as a condition precedent unless the provision plainly and unambiguously requires such construction.”); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 227 (1981).
Stannard v. Corner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Stannard v. Corner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 336 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 336 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co. v. James Lampe, General Contractor
Rinegar v. Rinegar 290 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Rinegar v. Rinegar 290 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes 97 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes 97 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Contractor, , , 514 *56 (App.1989) (“We presume that after admitting this evidence, the trial court considered it.”).
Decca Design Build, Inc. v. American Automobile Insurance 77 P.3d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Distinguished Decca Design Build, Inc. v. American Automobile Insurance 77 P.3d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
This situation is distinguishable from Able Distributing Co., Inc. v. James Lampe, General Contractor
Figueroa v. Delphi Acropolis 968 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Figueroa v. Delphi Acropolis 968 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Able Distributing Co., Inc. v. James Lampe, General Contractor
Premier Financial Services. v. Citibank 912 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Premier Financial Services. v. Citibank 912 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Heinig v. Hudman 865 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Heinig v. Hudman 865 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
v. James Lampe, , this court held that a non-party garnishing creditor was not bound by an arbitration agreement between the garnishee and the judgment debtor.
Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp. 802 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp. 802 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990