Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Exodyne Properties, Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 798 P.2d 1382.

26 citing documents.

Arizona Preservation Foundation; Tucson Historic Preservation Foundation v. Pima Community College Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Arizona Preservation Foundation; Tucson Historic Preservation Foundation v. Pima Community College Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
See Exodyne Props., -78 (App. 1990) (interpreting and applying city’s historic preservation ordinance, which gave rise to various legal rights).
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Corp., , (explaining the trial court has broad discretion in determining the reasonable amount of attorneys’ fees pursuant to § 12-341.01); see also Exodyne Prop., , (explaining that although a trial court is required to award reasonable attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party pursuant to A.R.S.
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
In Exodyne Prop., , this court analyzed A.R.S.
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Molera 27 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Molera 27 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of Flagstaff 991 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of Flagstaff 991 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Babe Investment v. Arizona Corp. Commission 939 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Babe Investment v. Arizona Corp. Commission 939 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See Exodyne Properties, , (court of appeals generally does not decide moot questions).
Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 870 P.2d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 870 P.2d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. 880 P.2d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. 880 P.2d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-79 , -88 (Ct.App.1990).
S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa County 875 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa County 875 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Exodyne Properties *503 v. City of Phoenix
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, Coconino County No. MH 1425 862 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, Coconino County No. MH 1425 862 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
E.g., Exodyne Properties
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 832 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 832 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Bills v. Arizona State Board of Education 819 P.2d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Bills v. Arizona State Board of Education 819 P.2d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991