Cited by

See Walls v. Ariz. Dep’t of Public Safety, (“Denial of leave to amend is generally considered an abuse of discretion where the amendment merely seeks to add a new legal theory supported by factual issues already in the case.”).

Safety, –97 (App. 1991).

Safety, 4 FURST v. MAYNE/ZIA Decision of the Court (App. 1991).

Safety, (explaining that if the amended pleading could still be defeated, granting leave to amend would be a futile gesture).

As previously determined by this court, “failure to make an arrest” includes the “failure to make an investigatory stop which may or may not lead to an arrest.” Walls v. Ariz. Dep’t of Public Safety

Safety, Greenberg has not shown the superior court abused its discretion in denying her motion for leave to file a third amended complaint.

Safety , , 597, , 1223 (App. 1991).

Safety, (acknowledging that decisions to investigate a crime or arrest a suspect “involve a judgment by a police officer”).

Safety, -16 (1977) (reversing directed verdict on gross negligence).

Safety, -97 , -23 (App. 1991).

In enacting the immunity statutes, the legislature “recognized that sovereign immunity is sometimes necessary given the breadth of the government’s exercise of power.” Walls v. Ariz. Dep’t of Public Safety

Safety, -97, -23 (App. 1991).