Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Walls v. Arizona Department of Public Safety, 826 P.2d 1217.

95 citing documents.

M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Revenue 216 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Revenue 216 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Watts v. Arizona Department of Revenue 210 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Watts v. Arizona Department of Revenue 210 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Greenwood v. State 175 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Greenwood v. State 175 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Safety, , it “should be granted ‘if the underlying facts or circumstances relied upon ...
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Action Marine, Inc. 161 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Action Marine, Inc. 161 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Safety, , (citing U.S. Parking Sys.
Armenta v. City of Casa Grande 71 P.3d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Armenta v. City of Casa Grande 71 P.3d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Sherman v. First American Title Insurance 38 P.3d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Sherman v. First American Title Insurance 38 P.3d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Safety, , (no abuse of discretion in denying motion to amend where amendment would have been futile); , (court should freely grant amendment absent such reasons as undue delay, bad faith, or futility of amendment).
Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Department 30 P.3d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Department 30 P.3d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Drucker v. Greater Phoenix Transportation Co. 3 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Drucker v. Greater Phoenix Transportation Co. 3 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Uyleman v. D.S. Rentco 981 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Uyleman v. D.S. Rentco 981 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Walls v. Arizona Dep’t of Public Safety
Dickey v. City of Flagstaff 4 P.3d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Dickey v. City of Flagstaff 4 P.3d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
¶ 13 In most cases, “the issue of gross negligence is a question of fact to be decided by the jury.” Walls v. Arizona Dep’t of Public Safety, , (citing Southern Pac.
Badia v. City of Casa Grande 988 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Badia v. City of Casa Grande 988 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
¶ 27 Whether gross negligence exists is generally a fact question for the jury, but it may be resolved on summary judgment if “no evidence is introduced that would lead a reasonable person to find gross negligence.” , see also Orme School .
Luchanski v. Officer J.L. Congrove 971 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Luchanski v. Officer J.L. Congrove 971 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
GST Tucson Lightwave, Inc. v. City of Tucson 949 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
GST Tucson Lightwave, Inc. v. City of Tucson 949 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Failure to make an arrest includes “failure to make an investigatory stop which may or may not lead to an arrest.” Walls v. Arizona Dep’t of Public Safety
MacCollum v. Perkinson 913 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
MacCollum v. Perkinson 913 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Walls v. Arizona Dep’t of Public Safety
Wareing v. Falk 897 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Wareing v. Falk 897 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Goss v. City of Globe 883 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Goss v. City of Globe 883 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
That issue, as involving interpretation of the statute, is a question of law, , which we review de novo.
Lakritz v. Superior Court 880 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Lakritz v. Superior Court 880 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
§ 12-820, codified in Laws 1984, ch. 285, § 1; see also Walls v. Arizona Dep’t of Public Safety
Tovrea v. Nolan 875 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Tovrea v. Nolan 875 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Mail Boxes, U.S.A. v. Industrial Commission 871 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast 888 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast 888 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993