Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. Aiken, 877 P.2d 1345.

80 citing documents.

Jane Doe I; Jane Doe II; And John Doe v. Lenzner Medical Services Llc... ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Jane Doe I; Jane Doe II; And John Doe v. Lenzner Medical Services Llc... ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Robertson v. Bacolas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Robertson v. Bacolas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ctr., (“The general rule is that ‘no private cause of action should be inferred based on a criminal statute[.]’”).
Liberti v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Liberti v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Rogers v. Hon Mroz 479 P.3d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rogers v. Hon Mroz 479 P.3d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Self v. Higher Logic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Self v. Higher Logic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aerial Funding v. Van Sickle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aerial Funding v. Van Sickle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ctr., (quotation omitted); accord Restatement (Second) Contracts § 208, cmt.
Bakker v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Bakker v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ctr., (citation omitted).
Merrick v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Merrick v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ctr., Inc., v. Aiken, (in considering grant of summary judgment, court considers only evidence before the superior court when it ruled).
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ctr., the court did not err by granting GEICO’s motion.
Maassen v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Maassen v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cach v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cach v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Taylor v. Aps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Taylor v. Aps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Casady v. Parker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Casady v. Parker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 336 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 336 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
nur/ibrahim v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
nur/ibrahim v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Ctr., Inc., v. Aiken, see also Cella Barr Assocs., n.1, n.1 (App. 1994) (refusing to consider transcripts attached to motion for reconsideration because they were not before the trial court when it ruled on the underlying motion); GM Dev.
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Ctr., 9 In ruling on consents, terms of incorporated document known or easily available to contracting parties, and context of reference makes clear writing part of contract).
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 231 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 231 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Edwards v. Board of Supervisors 229 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Edwards v. Board of Supervisors 229 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Mousa v. Saba 218 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Mousa v. Saba 218 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Green v. Garriott 212 P.3d 96 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Vig v. Nix Project II Partnership 212 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Vig v. Nix Project II Partnership 212 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Neal v. Brown 191 P.3d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by