Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nydam v. Crawford, 887 P.2d 631.

129 citing documents.

Risser v. Pinewood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(stating doctrine of confession of reversible error is discretionary).
Potts v. Potts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Potts v. Potts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(doctrine of confession of reversible error is discretionary).
Mothersed v. Greenen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mothersed v. Greenen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Savord v. Morton 330 P.3d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Savord v. Morton 330 P.3d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Davies v. Davies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Davies v. Davies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Delong v. Merrill 310 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Delong v. Merrill 310 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
See Nydam v. Crawford, 181 Ariz. 101, 101, see also Wickman v. Ariz. State Bd.
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(confession of reversible error doctrine is discretionary).
Stewart v. Stewart 286 P.3d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Stewart v. Stewart 286 P.3d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Patterson v. Patterson 248 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Patterson v. Patterson 248 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State of Arizona, Dept. of Economic Security v. Munoz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona, Dept. of Economic Security v. Munoz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Thompson v. Thompson 176 P.3d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Thompson v. Thompson 176 P.3d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Swift Transportation v. Industrial Commission 938 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Swift Transportation v. Industrial Commission 938 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(expressing reluctance to reverse on an “implied confession of error” where the trial court correctly applied the law).
Roddy v. County of Maricopa 911 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Roddy v. County of Maricopa 911 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
While we could construe this as a confession of error, see, , in the exercise of our discretion, we will decide the appeal on its merits.