Cited by

In our discretion we decline to treat Wife’s failure as a concession of reversible error, and instead consider the merits of Husband’s appeal

Although we could regard this failure as a confession of error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); ¶ 6 n.1 (App. 2008), in our discretion, we decline to do so

Although we could regard this failure as a confession of error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); ¶ 6 n.1 (App. 2008), in our discretion, we decline to do so

Although we could regard this failure as a confession of error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); ¶ 6 n.1 (App. 2008), in our discretion, we decline to do so

Although we could regard this failure as a confession of error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); ¶ 6 n.1 (App. 2008), in our discretion, we decline to do so

See Nydam v. Crawford , , 101, , 631 (App. 1994) (expressing reluctance to reverse upon an "implied confession of error" where the trial court correctly applied the law).

Although we could regard this failure as a confession of error, see ARCAP 15(a)(2); n.1, ¶ 6 (App. 2008), in our discretion, we decline to do so

The court set an evidentiary hearing for mid-February 2014, noting that 1 Husband did not file an answering brief, “which could constitute confession of reversible error.”

In our discretion, we decline to do so, (confession of reversible error doctrine is discretionary), and have reviewed the record and elected to address the merits of Merrick’s claims against defendants.