Cited by

Coop., (“A trial court’s general factual conclusions are reversed if they are clearly erroneous.”).

Coop., (rejecting a challenge to the foundation of documents not raised below) (citations omitted).

v. Byers, n.2 (App. 1997), and Westin Tucson Hotel Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, ).

Co-op., Estate of Hanges v. Metro.

Coop., , 301 n. 2, , 460 n. 2 (App.1997) (argument not raised until reply memorandum on summary judgment not considered by trial court); , (arguments raised for first time in trial court reply memorandum deemed

v. Byers, , (stating appellate court will not disturb the trial court’s rulings regarding the admissibility of evidence in summary judgment proceedings absent a clear abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice).

Coop., , 301 n.2, , 460 n.2 (App.1997) (argument not raised until reply memorandum on summary judgment not considered by trial court); , (arguments raised for first time in rial-court-reply memorandum

Co-op., , ("[W]here a court applies a theory of liability to facts, its ruling is a mixed question of law and fact which is reviewed de novo.

Co-op., , Hydroculture, 174 Ariz. at 283 , 848 P.2d at 862 .

v. Byers, , (court may consider facts alleged in verified complaint in determining whether summary judgment should be granted).