Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers, 942 P.2d 451.

56 citing documents.

Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Ortiz v. Rambo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Ortiz v. Rambo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Matthews v. Bridge III Az Onnix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Matthews v. Bridge III Az Onnix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Todd Underwood v. Thomas Wilczynski and Dana Wilczynski Janet A. Bewley... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
Todd Underwood v. Thomas Wilczynski and Dana Wilczynski Janet A. Bewley... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
Coop., (“A trial court’s general factual conclusions are reversed if they are clearly erroneous.”).
Garza v. Swift Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Garza v. Swift Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sampson v. Surgery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sampson v. Surgery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Capital One v. Castronova Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Capital One v. Castronova Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wells Fargo v. Hoskyns Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wells Fargo v. Hoskyns Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
state/ador v. Bosch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
state/ador v. Bosch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Coop., (rejecting a challenge to the foundation of documents not raised below) (citations omitted).
Evers v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Evers v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Byers, n.2 (App. 1997), and Westin Tucson Hotel Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, ).
Copper State v. Espiritu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Copper State v. Espiritu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cach v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cach v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Acarta v. Partridge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Acarta v. Partridge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hope v. Renaud Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hope v. Renaud Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Robert Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare 296 P.3d 42 Ariz. 2013
Robert Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare 296 P.3d 42 Ariz. 2013
Co-op., Estate of Hanges v. Metro.
MidFirst Bank v. Chase 284 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
MidFirst Bank v. Chase 284 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Coop., , 301 n. 2, , 460 n. 2 (App.1997) (argument not raised until reply memorandum on summary judgment not considered by trial court); , (arguments raised for first time in trial court reply memorandum deemed
United Insurance Co. of America v. Lutz 258 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
United Insurance Co. of America v. Lutz 258 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
v. Byers, , (stating appellate court will not disturb the trial court’s rulings regarding the admissibility of evidence in summary judgment proceedings absent a clear abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice).
STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. Campos 250 P.3d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. Campos 250 P.3d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Coop., , 301 n.2, , 460 n.2 (App.1997) (argument not raised until reply memorandum on summary judgment not considered by trial court); , (arguments raised for first time in rial-court-reply memorandum
Messina v. MIDWAY CHEVROLET CO. 209 P.3d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Messina v. MIDWAY CHEVROLET CO. 209 P.3d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Guardianship of Pacheco 199 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In Re Guardianship of Pacheco 199 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co-op., , ("[W]here a court applies a theory of liability to facts, its ruling is a mixed question of law and fact which is reviewed de novo.
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co-op., , Hydroculture, 174 Ariz. at 283 , 848 P.2d at 862 .
Rand v. Porsche Financial Services 167 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Rand v. Porsche Financial Services 167 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
v. Byers, , (court may consider facts alleged in verified complaint in determining whether summary judgment should be granted).
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007